It wasn’t hard to miss the tension in the room as residents of Bow Meadows gathered with Town of Cochrane staff to discuss a pathway in their community.
More than 40 people were at the RancheHouse June 25 to see what will happen to the pathway that winds down the east side of Jumping Pound Creek from George Fox Trail up to an environment reserve to the north, towards the Bow River.
The path has washed out more than once in past floods, and has been left since the last time it washed out in 2008.
Many of the residents came to the meeting upset as the town spent $6,000 pounding in stakes where it is recommending to move the path — a shift that will bring the path directly behind 20 Bow Meadows houses.
Bill Gibb, who lives in one of the 20 homes, said they all received a letter inviting them to a meeting to discuss the proposed pathway and it seemed as though the decision was already made.
“It was a shock,” he said. “We wondered where is the consultation process. We weren’t presented with any options. . . . It escalated the whole thing to a new level.
“The general feeling is the town has already made up its mind.”
Gibb said he feels like there has been a lack of communication between the town and residents.
“Councillors ran (in the last election) on better communication,” said Gibb, adding it is not working.
But at the June 25 meeting town staff did highlight three options for Bow Meadows residents. The project has a budget of $80,000.
The first option is to keep the pathway where it is and rebuild it with bridges. But a representative of landscape and engineering consultant Urban Systems told the crowd it would have a negative impact on the environment and the bridges would not stop the path washing out.
The second option is to do nothing and let nature reclaim the area, but this doesn’t jive with town policy to link all existing pathways.
The third is to move the pathway to the new alignment — closer to the homes. It would be on higher ground and cost less than repairing the original pathway, even with having to move 25 trees and shrubs.
Residents had problems with every option.
Gibb said the first option doesn’t solve the problem of flooding washing out the path, which could be a waste of taxpayers’ money.
He said the second option doesn’t work because people value the path and are naturally drawn to the water.
Gibb said the third option is the worst because the new path would land on a dike, which causes flooding and ice blockage problems for residents.
Also, he believes that it would negatively affect property values of the 20 homes affected, which he figured were worth $14-$18 million all together.
Another issue is the wildlife currently in the area between the homes and the path as it stands now, including fox dens.
Also, the community association had installed benches on the current path and was wondering what was going to happen to them.
Gibb said if the path moves closer to the homes the biggest problem is a lack of privacy for the residents, which can become a security issue when, for example, teenagers party in the area.
The residents presented an idea of their own. Called “low-level crossings” and using erosion control techniques, the idea would be to build a flood-proof path where it currently sits. These types of paths are used in Calgary in high flood areas, and in Australia.
“A special matting would . . . hold the (path) in place,” said Gibb. “It is porous, so water can go through it. When the flood is gone you can go right back onto it.”
Bow Meadows resident Bob Ruault suggested it could even save the town money as the contractors he has asked quoted $37,000 to $57,000 for the entire stretch of path.
The meeting wrapped up with a few words from Mayor Truper McBride.
“The purpose of this meeting was to see your opinions, and I understand your tension and concern,” he said. “We are really going to talk and really going to listen.”
Town staff said the next step is to make up a report with options and concerns for the July 13 council meeting.
Jim Anderson, director of operational services, said they also hope to hold a community-wide consultation in the near future.
“This is not just a Bow Meadows issue,” said Anderson, “but to all of Cochrane.”
Anderson stressed no decisions have been made, and he is interested in seeing more information on erosion control techniques and low-level crossings.
“It was quite intriguing,” he said. “We will look at it very closely. . . . Our message is we will certainly look at more options and costing.”