Tiny camera in hand worth more than big one on shelf

August 27, 2008
By: admin

Coffee with Warren
by Warren Harbeck
Meet Arac (pronounced like “Eric”). Arac is one of our newest coffee companions — and our creepiest. (His nickname is short for “Arachnid.”) Before I tell you how we got into our up-close relationship, however, allow me to share with you an important principle my wife, Mary Anna, and I have learned about taking photographs.
I’ll avoid getting tangled in a web of technicalities and get right to the heart of the matter: The camera you have with you will always take much better pictures than the camera sitting at home on the shelf.
That assumes, of course, that the camera you have with you, no matter how small and seemingly insignificant, is in working order and you’ve remembered to remove the lens cap — oh yes, and that the memory card isn’t full, or you haven’t run out of film.
Here I’m thinking especially about smaller “point-and-shoot” cameras — cameras without interchangeable lenses, and compact and light enough to fit in your pocket or purse, so that they’re always with you whenever you’re itching to capture that unexpected moment.
For me, that requirement is satisfied by my deck-of-cards-size Nikon Coolpix S8, tiny enough to fit in my shirt pocket without being seen. For Mary Anna, it’s her Canon PowerShot G9, capable of spectacular still-lifes, landscapes, and close-ups, yet only slightly larger than my Nikon S8. Both cameras are so convenient that they’re with us nearly all the time.
This certainly isn’t the case with my much larger and heavier Nikon D200 and its assortment of lenses and other accessories associated with professional and serious amateur photography. For me to take that wonderful camera off the shelf usually implies I have a specific shoot in mind. But it’s way too inconvenient — and intimidating — just to have hanging around my neck all the time for casual candids.
To be sure, there are those dedicated photojournalists who do indeed have one or more of these heavy-duty cameras with them at all times, and the results are clear for all to enjoy when they pick up publications and see the action shots that only high-end SLRs (single lens reflex cameras) are capable of — photojournalists like internationally-acclaimed sports and nature photographer Patrick Price, whose amazing heart-of-the-action images grace the covers of the Cochrane Eagle. (See my Dec. 28, 2005, column on Patrick at www.coffeewithwarren.com).
But for the rest of us, a small pocket or purse-size camera is just fine for those unplanned moments with family and friends, mountains and sunsets, pets . . . and Arac.
Ah yes, Arac. How did we come to meet him? It’s like this. As I was pulling out of the Cochrane Ranche parking lot with my wife after taking in this month’s Heritage Day festivities, Mary Anna said excitedly, “Warren, look at the spider that just landed on the windshield!”
Sure enough, there he was, quarter-inch underbelly, translucent legs, and all, separated from us by only a pane of glass. Before I could say “Yikes!” Mary Anna had her Canon G9 up against the inside of the windshield taking another great shot of nature’s magnificence.
Well, it’s that special time of year again, and Arac and I want to say, Happy Birthday, Mary Anna! The little camera you just happened to have with you sure took a much better shot of our creepy new friend than my great big camera sitting at home on the shelf.
(c) 2008 Warren Harbeck
warren@harbeck.ca.

Common sense needed for signs

August 27, 2008
By: admin

Dear Editor:
Well, so much for sense and sensibility.
Recently, enforcement policies and bylaw officer discretion reached new lows. The indiscriminate enforcement of the sign bylaw has now started forcing business to leave town.
Case in point: Brian Lehman Evaluations was in town to conduct an estate sale. The signs were carefully placed and those on private property were placed with permission of the owners.
The Lehman group checked with the town and had previously met with a bylaw officer to familiarize themselves with the regulations in our burgh by the Bow (due diligence, methinks). They even went the extra step of removing the signs each night, then placing them out again the next day.
Good enough? Well not for one bylaw officer. She tells them they can’t do what they are doing. They politely tell her the steps they have taken to ensure compliance.
Does she take the prudent and logical path and back off to check things out?
No, she stands her ground and as a result we now have a business that refuses to come back to Cochrane to conduct any further sales because despite its efforts to comply with our bylaw, their officials ran into roadblocks and are frustrated that they can’t seem to satisfy the bylaw officer no matter what they do.
Where has common sense and good governance gone?
Come on folks, let’s use some common sense and get with the program. It does not take a genius to realize that rather than persecute and waste time on signs, let’s come up with a workable program. Charge $5 for a sheet of stickers and relevant rules that a person can affix to their signs and then if the signs are not removed at the end of the event, or placed in illegal locations, charge a fee or fine to the registered owner of the sign.
I thought our goal was to attract people to town rather than drive them away.
Ian R. Cohen

New lawsuit may speak to larger issues for town

August 27, 2008
By: admin

Dear Editor:
Re: “Domtar site saga continues with new lawsuit”, Aug. 20 Cochrane Eagle.
Let me add to the letters to the editor I am sure you will receive on this one, likely including the complaint that our mayor shouldn’t have commented on something “before the courts”.
In my view, it requires comment precisely because it is “before the courts” and, I think, highlights ongoing issues that require attention.
The statement of claim by Cochrane Properties in this “saga” states that:
“4. On Nov. 4, 2005, and pursuant to s.418(4) of the Municipal Government Act, (Cochrane) Properties and (Town of) Cochrane entered into a Memorandum of Agreement for the payment by Properties to Cochrane of tax arrears on the Lands. The Agreement provided for the payment of amounts then owing by Properties together with future taxes for 2006, 2007, and 2008. Payment of the amounts owing under the Agreement was to be made by June 30, 2008.”
A title search appears to indicate that the tax lien applied to the entire parcel, including Safe-way and Canadian Tire. What the town did here was to allow the payment of the back taxes three years from November of 2005, as well as giving Cochrane Properties a “free pass” on paying its future taxes for three additional years on the entire property.
A look at title shows the tax notification having been registered in early 2003. (Presumably that would be for the previous year). Division 8 of the Municipal Government Act (MGA), indicates that a tax sale: i) was mandatory; ii) would have commenced in March of 2004; iii) would have concluded by March, 2005, unless there was an agreement in place under 418(4) which allows back taxes to be paid over “. . . a period not exceeding three years . . . ” (Then-mayor Ken Bech and a new council were elected in the fall of 2004.)
The problem here is that this “agreement” was executed sometime in November 2005, some eight months after the mandatory tax sale would have been concluded.
In addition, from discussions on cochraneissues.com, it appears that the town has been taking cash-in-lieu instead of reserve for ridiculously low numbers, in apparent contravention of section 667 of the MGA. One of those cash-in-lieu payments relates to a subdivision application for (you guessed it) those same Domtar lands. And just comfortably “under the wire” for the June 30, 2008, payment deadline mentioned in the statement of claim. (The other relates to the Robinson property which is to be the home of the relocated Cochrane Dodge.)
So as not to mislead anyone, the above two cash-in-lieu issues occurred with the new mayor and council, and not Bech’s group. This raises a whole nest of other issues, which have been discussed on cochraneissues.com.
Meanwhile, our tax bills have escalated some 4.2 per cent this year. That should have been a tax drop if even close to proper cash-in-lieu had been achieved.
Bear with me while I cite two last sections of the MGA:
• 201(1) A Council is responsible for . . .
b) making sure that the powers, duties and functions of the municipality are appropriately carried out;
(c) carrying out the powers, duties and functions expressly given to it under this or any other enactment;
• and Council may act only by resolution or bylaw (s.180).
I think there is enough reason to suspect that a culture has developed at the Town of Cochrane of ignoring the provisions of the MGA on regular occasions, to the detriment of the taxpayer.
First off, let’s release this “agreement” to the public. Secondly, let’s release any resolutions or bylaws that might exist relating to this “agreement”, and any documents relating to a tax sale on the property. Perhaps that will explain everything to our satisfaction.
If these documents are not made public, (and even if they are) I suggest that the Town of Cochrane needs to hire a lawyer, or consultant with legal training — sooner rather than later — and give him/her carte blanche to look into the Domtar and cash-in-lieu matters (and at least one other ongoing lawsuit against the town by a developer), with a view to identifying any problem areas (or personnel), and making recommendations as to whatever steps might be required to ensure that the financial interests of the town are protected, and relevant law is clearly followed by both council and administration. That report, and those recommendations, need to be made public.
As taxpayers, we are entitled to an explanation of what has gone on in this whole sorry mess, a clear explanation of what is going to happen in the future, and what the impact on our taxes is apt to be, and why.
Wayne Lenhardt

History, bird info abounds at Perrenoud Ranche

August 27, 2008
By: admin

Walking the Land
By Pam Asheton
For the first time in five years my red-tailed hawks haven’t nested across the creek, replaced instead by two stunningly powerful ravens and a pair of nesting Swainson’s. I have missed those distinctive hunting screams as part of past summer memories. Red-tails are, though, beginning to gather these hot afternoons along the exposed limestone hilltop slabs atop Horse Creek’s winding road, a significant indication of their migratory journey southwards. Last Sunday, an incredible 14 were circling above the exposed slabs of rimrock, feathering the thermals.
Swainsons have definitely been more numerous this year than in previous years. Dropping in at the annual picnic enjoyed by organizers and volunteers of the Rocky Mountain Eagle Research Foundation at the historic Perrenoud Ranche on Weedon Trail last weekend, I found out why. Eight to 10 years ago these hawks’ wintering grounds in Argentina were bombarded with DDT spray, and their population dropped dramatically. (DDT reduces fertility and also softens the egg shells so dramatically as to be transparent).
Alternative methods of controlling mosquitoes and grasshoppers (their favourite food), were negotiated and their breeding numbers have popped right back up again — something that happened about 7,000 miles away is noticeable right here around Cochrane.
Organizer of the Perrenoud Ranche event Peter Sherrington, and his birders, brought binoculars, waterproof notebooks and pencils. They may count eagles but they’re also birders.
On this hot, perfect afternoon they noticed the little slough to the back of the property, notebooks came out and you could hear mutters of, “Coots, of course, and did you see (some obscure name) finch?”
Those aerobatic miracles, barn swallows, dipped and dived, and I learned that worldwide their population is dwindling too, fewer insects apparently in the air these days.
Peter recently received a wonderful accolade by his peers in the form of an Emerald Award for “institutional and organizational leadership. Shortly, he’ll be collecting another of real merit, the Dr. J.D. Soper Award, awarded by the Alberta Society of Professional Biologists, for his ornithology and migration authority.
He tried very hard to look suitably modest while passing along this information, but I know how hard he has worked, how his wife Barbara has supported every inch of the way despite four long-term individual bouts of cancer, and their gratitude to pipeline company Enbridge for sponsoring research last year (a contract not renewed despite stunning publicity through full-page advertisements, particularly noticeable in Canadian Geographic).
It is the Sherringtons’ dedication to long-term studies that will, in the end, provide priceless research for future generations of eagle migrations that began, incredibly, more than 11,000 years ago.
One of the ranch’s original log buildings at the back of the property is still well intact. One member peered through a glassless window frame and remarked on the chimney of original yellow bricks from the foundry that would have been close to where the Highway 1A restaurant is located, of which most Cochrane heritage houses were constructed.
The ranch’s first buildings had roof boards covered with sod, and log corrals. This was primarily a horse supplying ranch, for homesteaders and then for the First World War, with Hackneys, German Coach, Clydesdales and Shires). The French-born Charles Perrenoud (who had trained as a diamond cutter in London) and his wife Ellisa had three children: George, Emma and Agnes.
The family was artistic and the present curator, Stan Phelps, likes to think they would approve of the two-storey farmhouse’s exhibitions over the last four years. (The building is owned by the province and leased by the Cochrane and Heritage Association).
The spring venture displayed more than 93 works of art, including many of Agnes’s paintings, in the building constructed by carpenters the Chapman brothers in 1910-12. Interestingly, Agnes had received tuition from famed artist Roland Gissing, whose granddaughter showed up to admire the art nearly a century later.
The next exhibition and fall celebration runs from noon to 5 p.m. on Sept. 13-14, and Sept. 20-21. It will feature work from the Foothills, Cochrane and Chinook Art Clubs. There’ll be somewhere around 40 artists and roughly 150 or 200 paintings, and you get to talk to the artists about their techniques and ideas that sparked their work — a neat intimacy that personalizes purchases.
Stan, a resident there who tends to work outdoors, first with fast drying acrylics and then into oils, is a natural host. He’s encouraged Grade 4 students from more than 27 Rocky View schools to attend this year, attracted 100 works displayed upstairs, while downstairs he explained the Perrenoud and Hutchinson family photographs framed up along the pine walls. Ice cream served atop the original stove was very popular indeed.
This year’s fall exhibition will have every artist bringing in a home-baked pie Sept. 13, with local judging and ice-cream and coffee served alongside.
Pam Asheton can be reached at Sunwired@hotmail.com.

Two plans trip up Springbank residents, developer

August 27, 2008
By: admin

By Cori Lee Miller
The Eagle
Two overlapping area structure plans in Springbank are causing headaches for both a developer and area residents.
Harmony, a Bordeaux Developments community, falls under both the north and central Springbank area structure plans (ASP).
The development will border the north and west edge of the Springbank Airport. Harmony would occupy more than 1,750 acres and could attract 10,000 residents to the area.
A proposed Rocky View bylaw would have Harmony continue following its conceptual scheme but the development would stick to regulations set out by the central ASP.
A public hearing on the bylaw is set for Sept. 9 when Rocky View council will address amendments to the area structure plans. An ASP is a framework that describes population density, land uses and road networks.
Lorie Pesowski, director of planning and community services for Rocky View, said the hearing is a matter of simplifying the process.
“It’s a housekeeping exercise,” said Pesowski.
But some Springbank residents are unhappy with plans to exclude the ASPs.
Gloria Wilkinson said that excluding areas plans already in place is pushing the existing community to the side.
“I think proposals should come in and be a part of the community, not impose on it,” said Wilkinson, who was part of the community panel that put the existing structure plans together.
“It feels like they want to build a city,” said Wilkinson of the project, which includes a high-end 18-hole golf course. “You’re still in rural Alberta.”
Mitch Yurchak, councillor for the area, said he is concerned about the public volunteering its time again if the ASP is not taken into consideration.
“The long lasting concern will be public perception,” said Yurchak.
Biral Fisekci, president and chief executive officer of Bordeaux Developments, said Harmony’s conceptual scheme will not modify existing area structure plans to a great extent.
The largest change would involve industrial zones being built in close proximity to the airport instead of residential areas.
“I don’t think anyone feels there should be houses connected to the airport,” said Fisekci.

What was mayor thinking?

August 27, 2008
By: admin

Dear Editor:
The article in last week’s paper, “Domtar site saga continues with new lawsuit”, requires a number of responses.
Why is Mayor Truper McBride commenting on a matter before the courts? On the one hand he states that the “town is on rock solid ground” but in the next breath goes on to attack former-mayor Ken Bech and the former council (except McBride himself).
How can the town be on rock solid ground but somehow the previous mayor and the majority of council have done something wrong?
Has our mayor just admitted guilt that will now cost the town $140,000 for something that was on rock solid ground?
Is the mayor prepared to take financial responsibility for his actions?
Our mayor also has over-generalized his attack on the former-Domtar lands and indirectly developers in general. Let’s be clear: the developer now suing the town is not the developer that is trying to develop and clean up the former-Domtar land.
With any profession, business or politicians, there are many good people but there are always some rotten apples.
Finally, could (reporter) Brad Herron please do a follow-up story explaining what it is the town is being sued for? This is not at all clear nor does it make much sense: “. . . $140,000 in property taxes it was late in paying.”
Randy Mabbott

Shame on Mayor McBride

August 27, 2008
By: admin

Dear Editor:
With regards to comments made last week in the Cochrane Eagle concerning the Domtar lawsuit, I’m disappointed but not surprised by the immaturity and lack of respect being shown by our mayor to the previous council and the citizens of Cochrane as a whole.
I’m not sure what your motives are but time will tell.
First of all, our community (the citizens who live/work and play here) has finally balanced the books on an outstanding tax bill and has received almost $500,000 as directed by the previous council. Plans are ongoing to develop the former-Domtar site that will generate close to $1 million annually in revenue for the citizens of Cochrane.
Imagine what can be done with those funds. Not only will hundreds of jobs be created, but let’s also consider what this development will do for the business retention and attraction promotion currently underway within the town administration.
It’s time to get over the “big box” issue as not everyone in our community is against it (unless you live and govern in a bubble of your own).
Being on council ultimately means dealing with tough decisions at times, so stop blaming others (which is so easy to do), pull up your “big boy” pants and get on with the job of being the mayor of a very dynamic and progressive community.
Last of all, shame on you young man for discrediting and disrespecting everyone and anyone who has ever put their name forward to serve as a member of council in this great place that we call home.
Ken Bech,
former mayor of Cochrane

Readers, what do you think of police accountability?

August 27, 2008
By: admin

To The Point
By Art Hanger
I find it curious that certain criminal lawyers always search out judicial comments which imply that the police, in general, are a bunch of reckless uncontrolled lawbreakers and left to their own devices would march the country into a totalitarian state like China. One legal mind, criminal lawyer Edward Greenspan, made such a comparison in a Toronto Sun column.
The story goes like this: An Ontario police officer was going about his business when he noticed a car with no licence plate on the front — which is an offence in Ontario where two plates are issued by the province. The police officer turned on his flashing lights and proceeded to pull the guy over. Before he stopped him, the officer noted that the car was licensed in Alberta where one licence plate is the norm. He knows that it is not an offence to drive an Alberta-registered car in Ontario, but pulls over the driver anyway.
Here you have a police officer who obviously over the years had honed his investigative instincts which brought into focus some little thing about the driver and vehicle that warranted the stop in his judgment. He was dead right!
The Toronto lawyer recounts: “The officer questioned the driver, Bradley Harrison, despite having no legal right to do so, and learned that Harrison’s license had been suspended. The officer then arrested him and searched the car. He found 77 lb. of cocaine.”
Don’t forget the trial judge, according to Greenspan, found the officer’s actions a flagrant, brazen violation of the cocaine pusher’s rights under the charter. The judge did, however, admit the cocaine into evidence and Harrison was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison. One more pusher off the streets.
I understand as much as the next guy that we can’t have a legal system that allows the police or other government agents to stop and search people willy-nilly. Our fundamental democratic freedoms demand otherwise. But let’s not be silly. It’s one thing to establish a system that prevents the government from unnecessarily handcuffing criminal suspects. It’s something entirely different when the system handcuffs police before they can act on a hunch and carry out an investigation. If Harrison was innocent he would have forgotten all about his being pulled over.
I’m not intimately familiar with the case, but I expect that Harrison — apart from having a suspended license — was behaving suspiciously to the officer at the scene. As a former police officer, I have been in many circumstances where it was plainly obvious that a suspect was guilty of something more than what I originally thought just simply by the way he was behaving. Maybe it was what he was saying. Maybe it was as simple as the way he was standing, or dodging direct eye contact. We’ve all experienced this kind of behaviour in others. So why then should we prevent the police from investigating suspicious behaviour? We should not prevent the police from doing their job!
In a case such as this, the downside of a search of an innocent person’s vehicle is the potential loss of a few minutes of driving time. I recognize that there are many other circumstances where the government’s right to search must be stringently limited. We can’t have the government searching our homes on a hunch and common-law principles prevent such action. But really, having spotted something apparently suspicious on a roadside, then confirming that a driver is unlicensed, is it really unreasonable for the officer to want to search a car? Clearly not in Harrison’s case.
Ottawa lobbyists such as criminal rights advocacy groups, some criminal bar representatives, etc., frequently seek to curtail police authority and encumber investigations with a burdensome process which often overshadows the truth. The result of this testimony over time has spawned legislation that has muddied the waters of enforcement.
Sir Robert Peel, a founder of “modern policing”, put forward nine basic principles of policing, the ninth being “the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.”
The convicted drug trafficker Harrison would now be absent from the community all due to a sound police investigation and a judge who looked to the greater good of the community. Just imagine how much more damage would occur if the 77 lb. of cocaine had been distributed into our communities — wasted and damaged lives because of addiction, a vicious cycle of violence, drugs and crime. Personally, I don’t like the prospect.
I served the residents of Calgary as a police officer for some 22 years and I, like tens of thousands of officers across the country who came before me or followed, swore an oath of office to uphold the law of the land, then went about our time-honoured profession with integrity. We operated under a code of ethics part of which stated: “As a law enforcement officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice.”
This code says it all. It reflects police accountability to the public and police responsibility to enforce the law without favour. Should a criminal’s rights under the charter supercede public safety? I want to hear from you. E-mail me at calgary@arthangermp.com, or write to Suite 140, 2635–37th Ave., N.E., Calgary, AB., T1Y 5Z6.
Art Hanger is the Member of Parliament for Calgary Northeast and the chairman of the House of Commons Justice Committee

Backpacks of school supplies okay for now

August 27, 2008
By: admin

By Sarah Junkin
The Eagle
Despite reports that many Calgary agencies are running out of back-to-school backpacks filled with supplies for needy families, it’s not a problem in Cochrane, according to community resource worker Claire Young.
“It doesn’t look any worse here than in previous years,” she said, responding to the Salvation Army’s fears that it may not have enough to meet the growing demand in the city.
The program was previously run by the Cochrane Youth Foun-dation (formerly the Boys and Girls Club). But that group has recently been in a transition phase, so Young decided to take on the job.
“We’re concentrating mainly on the higher grades,” she said, adding a supply list for each grade can be downloaded from the Rocky View school division’s website at www.rockyview.ab.ca.
Anyone willing to help out should drop off filled backpacks at 209 Second Ave. West.
Anyone looking to receive one should call 403-851-2255.

Why even publish article on new Domtar lawsuit?

August 27, 2008
By: admin

Dear Editor:
In response to Bard Herron’s article on the Domtar saga and the comments of Mayor Truper McBride, I have to question why this article was even published.
I am confused by the focus of this article. It’s hard to identify what will be accomplished by digging into the previous council’s decisions in regards to the current lawsuit against the town.
Unless someone can come forward and provide evidence that an individual or group acted in violation of the law, what is there to say about it?
The mayor is even quoted as saying that Cochrane Properties likes “to sue us quite a bit.” Should we not be discussing the cost to taxpayers of frivolous law suits?
McBride says the “town is on rock solid ground,” so who is really to blame for legal cost?
As far as my understanding of how council works, a mayor’s vote is worth one vote, no more than any other member. So how is it that it can be said that the responsibility for a decision made in council belongs to former-mayor Ken Bech alone?
As the very same article spelled out, there were four members in favour, two against and one absent. Since McBride wishes that Bech could be held accountable for the expenses from the current lawsuit against the town, wouldn’t it be proper to send the bill to all those that voted in favour?
If a councillor or mayor were held responsible for the unforeseen consequences of their choices in council chambers then nothing would ever happen. The men and women who make these choices do so at the request of the public. Each one was chosen, by the members of our community, to represent the members of our community and as such should be allowed to go on with their lives after their term is over with gratitude for their time.
Every time you start a new job you inherit someone else’s mess — it’s what you do about them that defines your career.
Thomas Turner