Council goes behind doors on EMS site
By Shawn Logan
The Eagle
Cochrane council was set to meet behind closed doors Sept. 27 to discuss plans for a new protective services building and the potential of a public-private-partnership (P3) for the facility.
Council had been scheduled to discuss the matter in-camera (usually held after the regular meeting, where the public and media are not permitted) Sept. 26 but a lengthy council session led to a call to postpone the discussion.
Mayor Ken Bech said at the Sept. 26 meeting the discussion should be postponed because of the “intense” nature of the issue.
Last year council settled on rebuilding at the existing fire/EMS station and former town hall site, a project estimated to cost $3.9 million.
But after a local group purchased land near the Cochrane Towne Square shopping centre earlier this year, the town entered into talks to lease space to house its fire, EMS and bylaw services on that site, which is also slated to house a separate medical clinic.
Julian deCocq, the town’s chief administrative officer, wouldn’t discuss details of the matter prior to the Sept. 27 meeting because “it’s not proper to disclose any degree of discussions.”
“There is a report containing a number of options for council to review,” deCocq said, adding details can’t be released until properly reviewed by council. “There are options council has to consider, including a decision to stay with the current property or to shift gears.”
He noted a decision “may or may not be made” following the in-camera session as council may discover more information is needed.
“Anything presented will be released in full,” deCocq added.
The new site had been one of four studied by the town, but the existing site was deemed the best fit as the province had planned to take over municipal ambulance services.
But after the province backed away from its plans, the town opted to take a second look at the other site, deCocq said in July.
Bech was also reticent about discussing the reasons for the closed session.
“The Town of Cochrane has an economic interest in this and it falls under that section of FOIP (Freedom of Information and Privacy Act),” Bech said.
Asked to confirm whether details of a P3 arrangement were being discussed and whether the public would have a chance to have a say on the matter, Bech had little to say.
“I won’t discuss any part of it,” he said.
Results of the in-camera meeting were not available by press time Sept. 27.

