Trustees narrowly pass budget
By Shawn Logan
The Eagle
Rocky View School Division trustees narrowly passed the 2005/2006 operating budget June 23 as the erosion of school-based decision-making and fewer bus routes for rural students raised concerns.
The proposed $108 million budget passed 4-3, however trustees heard that because the board has yet to receive maintenance funding from the province, the budget may have to be re-opened.
Secretary-Treasurer Darrell Couture said the division has had to estimate that portion (just over $9 million) until Alberta Infrastructure disburses its grant funding.
“We would be re-budgeting when we know the grant information,” Couture said, adding the grant levels likely won’t match soaring materials costs. “It’s probably not going to be sufficient.”
Couture outlined a number of issues that will be faced by the division because of the budget.
As a result of the province’s goal to reduce class sizes through Kindergarten to Grade 9, there will be a loss of school-based decision-making as the board will make staffing decisions instead of school principals.
Transportation grants rose by only three per cent, but Couture said a five per cent increase would have been needed to meet the increased price of diesel fuel. To cover the cost, the division has cut 12 of its 243 routes, which will result in longer ride times.
A number of service areas also had to be cut to balance the budget including school budgets, resource programs and technology acquisitions. Staffing cuts had to be made in human resources and the planning department, while the early literacy co-ordinator position was eliminated.
Couture added the province should be implementing utility agreements with school divisions instead of the current practice of boards drafting individual supply contracts.
The concessions made to balance the budget didn’t sit well with some trustees.
Cochrane-area trustee John Murray said reducing bus services for rural students was unfair in a budget that did little for rural families.
“I still don’t like cutting bus routes and adding to the ride times for students. It’s just not acceptable to save some money,” Murray said. “There’s nothing in this budget for rural parents and it will somehow affect all of them.”
Proposed cuts to special needs funding raised concerns for Cochrane trustee Trudy Hauser, as did the way maintenance funds had been allocated to schools.
Meanwhile, Crossfield trustee Don Thomas was unhappy with the erosion of school-based decision-making.
“I have a large number of reservations about this budget. The loss of (local) control has dire consequences,” Thomas said. “I believe we should look at this budget and pass it with the proviso that we would like to amend it and resurrect school-based decision-making.”
Thomas also raised concerns about the “last minute” nature of the budget, which didn’t allow for adjustments by trustees.
Springbank trustee and board Vice-Chair Maureen Munro said the delay from the province in disbursing grant funding was to blame for the rush to put together the budget.
“Our budget process was lagging a bit this year because we did not have grant information from the province in a timely manner,” Munro said. “This isn’t our typical budget.”
School board budgets must be forwarded to the province by June 30 and must not have a deficit or surplus. The budget passed despite opposition from Thomas, Murray and Hauser.


