Councillor suggests shifting subdivision authority
By Shawn Logan
The Eagle
A Cochrane councillor wants to review transferring subdivision authority to the town, a move that would eliminate the Cochrane Planning Commission (CPC).
Coun. Ken Hynes said while the CPC has done a good job, the town should consider turning over the authority of granting approvals for developments to town council.
“I think the council being the subdivision authority is a pretty good idea,” Hynes said. “I don’t believe the planning commission is doing a bad job. It’s an issue of planning and whether or not the town should take that on.”
Currently, the planning commission, which includes a pair of councillors, approves development permits and has the authority to impose conditions to make plans align with the town’s planning vision.
The body is advised by town administrators and is mostly made up of volunteers appointed by council.
Hynes said he is raising the issue (likely at the Feb. 28 council meeting) to discuss its merits and determine if the town wants to go in a new direction.
“Like many issues, it would benefit from an open discussion of council,” Hynes said. “Why don’t we talk and if we’re satisfied then things should remain the same?”
Hynes said he is concerned that under the current system, once council signs off on a subdivision and land use “that is the last we see of a particular issue.”
He noted the Municipal Government Act allows a municipality to determine how it handles subdivision authority. It can be a publicly-appointed committee, a council committee or even a single administrator.
While acknowledging appointing volunteers to guide how developments are implemented promotes “increased public participation,” Hynes argued that an elected council maintains some of that public involvement.
“They would be participating in the fact that they elected us to do the job,” he said.
The first-term councillor also acknowledged, “It could be perceived as not having the same level of public participation.”
Any developer can appeal rulings by the planning commission to the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board.
Hynes said regardless of the outcome, the appeal board should remain intact and, if council becomes the subdivision authority and abolishes the CPC, it should consist entirely of members of the public.
“There would be a perceived conflict, a real conflict,” he said.
Hynes dismissed the notion that taking over subdivision authority was putting too much on council’s plate.
“I don’t necessarily think of it as micro-management,” he said. “I see it as a useful engagement of council.”

